[Isis-users] ABCD - fields marked with < >

Wed Sep 5 01:12:07 CEST 2012

Primero, para Wenke... 
Viste linda?, el ogro no se olvidó de tu comentario en Rio de Janeiro en el 2008, le quedo grabado, je je.

Y a todos, 
Wenke Adams, nuestra colega de Chile y muchas otras partes del mundo, en el Congreso de Río (2008) comento que ABCD, que se presentaba en sociedad, traía los 154 registos originales, no solo del Winisis, del anciano MICROISIS, je je.
Y a nuestro estimado Ernesto, ogro al fin, le quedo entre ceja y ceja... -je je- el comentario.

Ernesto
ya me di cuenta lo que quieres hacer, GENIAL, mañana me pongo con eso, si lo logro, solucioné el temita... ya que esa base, que es de una universidad, estaria de 10 con el iAH. 
Gracias Ernesto
de verdad, ogro, pero genio... o Genio, pero ogro... 
No se... cual va... je je
Saludos
M.M.MacLean
-----
First, for Wenke ...
You see, dear?, The ogre did not forget your comment in Rio de Janeiro in 2008, stuck with him, je je.

And to all,
Wenke Adams, our colleague from Chile and many other parts of the world, in the Rio Congress (2008) commented that ABCD, as presented in society, showing the 154 MFN the original, not only the Winisis, old MICROISIS, je je.
And to our dear Ernesto finally ogre, that comment was left between the eyes ... -je-je.

Ernesto
and I realized what I want to do, great, tomorrow I start with that, if I succeed, I solved the issue ... since this basis, it is a university, would be excellent at IAH.
Thanks, Ernesto
really, ogre, but genius ... or genius, but ogre ...
No ... which is ... je je
Regards
M.M.MacLean
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: spinaker 
  To: isis-users at iccisis.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 7:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [Isis-users] ABCD - fields marked with < >

  Dear everybody

  María Mercedes' question is very important to all users of Isis family, so I'll give one of the many solutions in my basic English (or something  like this)

  Using the <...> to mark terms to be indexed with technique 2, is really a problem today because it conflicts with  html/xml tags

  The reason for using this technique goes back to the distant past of computers (about 30 years), when hard drives were very expensive and each byte you saved in a record was significant. A 10MB hard disk in the early 80s could cost a week's wages,

  But let us turn to the problem

  My personal view (others may say different) is that it is convenient to convert all fields  using <...> for indexing, to repeatable fields. There are two or three ways to do this using CISIS programs ... surely you were already suspecting ;-) 

  Let's take the CDS demo database that comes with the Winisis to explain the trick
  (I hear a scream of Wenke Adam from the other side of the Andes ... but yes, CDS demo base is very convenient

  Method I

  CDS dbase uses field 69 with keywords enclosed with <...>

   69 Paper on: <plant physiology> <moisture> <temperature> <wind> <measurement and instruments> <ecosystems>

  We will replace the chains:    ><  and  > <   by the symbol  %
  and we will also remove from the records the begining text: Paper on:
  for this we need to build a gizmo file
  a simple way to make a gizmo file is preparing a simple text file using notepad and then create the gizmo using mx

  Let's create xxx.txt with notepad and write the following lines

    > <|%
    > <|%
    > |
    <|
    Paper on: |

  give <enter> in the last line, and save it

  Note that lines 3 to 5 do not have anything to the right of the symbol  |

  now from the command line of the operating system do the following

  C:\> mx seq=xxx.txt create=xxx now -all
  C:\> mx cds gizmo=xxx,69  create=cds1 now -all tell=10

  Now let's take a look to the field v69, and see the changes

   69  plant physiology%moisture%temperature%wind%measurement and instruments%ecosystems

  Almost there, missing a step

  c:\> mxcp cds1 create=cds2 repeat=%,69 clean

  look now the record

    69  «plant physiology»
    69  «moisture»
    69  «temperature»
    69  «wind»
    69  «measurement and instruments»
    69  «ecosystems»

  There are other more sophisticated ways to do the same, but when you master this procedure ask for the rest
  It is highly recommended that you learn to use the tools included in  CISIS package, 

  Regards
  Ernesto Spinak

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  El 04/09/2012 17:16, María Mercedes MacLean escribió:

    Hola a todos, tengo una base de 8600 MFN, que está mal cargada.... de hecho no puedo trabajarla en el GenisisWeb ya que se corta el diccionario, 
    La migre a ABCD para ver si podia verla mas o menos mejor con el iAH
    El tema es que los descriptores estan cargados asi:
    <Semiótica> <Economía> <Política> <Historia> <Sociología> <cultura> <Educación> <Literatura><Psicología> <Religiosidad> <Filosofía> <Teología Práctica> <Historia de las Iglesias> <Biblia> <Contexto Bíblico> <Teología sistemática>
    Entonces, si bien el diccionario del ABCD me muestra una que otra palabra suelta, lo que mas hay son numeros 1 y todos los terminos juntos  ...  hasta que no hay mas espacios y se corta.
    ¿Alguien le ve solucion?
    Y la segunda duda
    ¿Como hago en ABCD un formateo para que me muestre ese campo 76 completo? 
    Aunque diga   if p(v76) then  '<i>Descriptores:</i> ', (v76+|;  |/) fi,

    no muestra nada porque lo toma como un campo no repetible....
    En fin, perdon Alguna ayuda?
    Saludos
    -----------------------------

    Hello to all, I have a base of 8600 MFN that is not well loaded.... in fact I cannot work her since in the GenisisWeb intersects the dictionary,   
    The migre to ABCD to see if could see it better with the iAH  
    The topic is that the describers are loaded this way:
    <Semiótica> <Economía> <Política> <Historia> <Sociología> <cultura> <Educación> <Literatura><Psicología> <Religiosidad> <Filosofía> <Teología Práctica> <Historia de las Iglesias> <Biblia> <Contexto Bíblico> <Teología sistemática>

    Then, although the dictionary of the ABCD shows me one that another loose word, that that but there is they are together numbers 1 and all the terms... until there is not but spaces and intersects.  
    Does somebody see him solution?  
    And the second doubt  
    As I make in ABCD a formateo so that it shows me that field 76 complete?   
    Although says 
    if p(v76) then  '<i>Descriptores:</i> ', (v76+|;  |/) fi,

    it doesn't show anything because takes it as a field non repetible....  
    The end... sorry, help?  
    Greetings
    Maria Mercedes MacLean
    http://www.proyectoleonardo.com.ar/AulaVirtual/
    gaspyy at infovia.com.ar
    3m at proyectoleonardo.com.ar
    3m at bibliotecalista.com.ar
    3m at mamercedesmaclean.com.ar
    Visite nuestros proyectos
    www.proyectoleonardo.com.ar

_______________________________________________
isis-users mailing list
isis-users at iccisis.org
To manage your own subscription options go to: http://lists.iccisis.org/listinfo/isis-users
Or contact Henk Rutten: hlrutten at xs4all.nl

-- 
  .^.                                .^.
  ( )                                ( )
  ===                                ===
 =[=]================================[=]=
  | |  Ernesto Spinak                | |
  | |  spinaker at adinet.com.uy        | |
  | |  Montevideo, Uruguay           | |
  | |  tel/fax  (598) 2622-3352      | |
  | |  celular  (598) 99612238      | |
 =[=]================================[=]=
  ===                                ===
  ( )                                ( )
   V                                  V 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  isis-users mailing list
  isis-users at iccisis.org
  To manage your own subscription options go to: http://lists.iccisis.org/listinfo/isis-users
  Or contact Henk Rutten: hlrutten at xs4all.nl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.iccisis.org/pipermail/isis-users/attachments/20120904/4670fdfe/attachment.html>